Halvergate Marshes

25. On Housing, how much do you Agree or Disagree with the following statements?

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree No Answer
More new building would spoil the village 66 36 23 25 7 9
New houses would be OK so long as ‘in fill’ rather than expanding on to new land 20 55 30 28 22 11
There is a case for building bungalows – especially for the elderly 33 53 37 24 14 5
Smaller homes, affordable to younger families, should be encouraged 20 54 47 25 12 8
We need a comprehensive plan covering building development in the area 43 69 33 9 4 8

 

 

a) More new building would spoil the village

Response All
Strongly Agree 66
Agree 36
Neutral 23
Disagree 25
Strongly Disagree 7
No Answer 9

 

Breakdown by village

Response Halvergate Tunstall No Answer
Strongly Agree 58 8 0
Agree 31 3 2
Neutral 20 2 1
Disagree 18 2 5
Strongly Disagree 7 0 0
No Answer 7 1 1

 

 

Breakdown by 'Age of Household'

Response 20-24 25-29 30-44 45-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85-89 90+ NoAnswer
Strongly Agree 0 1 14 25 2 12 8 1 0 3
Agree 0 0 4 10 5 8 6 3 0 0
Neutral 0 1 7 3 3 4 4 0 1 0
Disagree 0 3 7 4 2 6 2 0 1 0
Strongly Disagree 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0
No Answer 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 2

 

 

b) New houses would be OK so long as ‘in fill’ rather than expanding on to new land   

Response All
Strongly Agree 20
Agree 55
Neutral 30
Disagree 28
Strongly Disagree 22
No Answer 11

 

 

Breakdown by Village

Response Halvergate Tunstall No Answer
Strongly Agree 18 1 1
Agree 48 5 2
Neutral 25 3 2
Disagree 23 3 2
Strongly Disagree 19 3 0
No Answer 8 1 2

 

 

Breakdown by 'Age of Household'

Response 20-24 25-29 30-44 45-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85-89 90+ NoAnswer
Strongly Agree 0 0 2 6 2 5 4 1 0 0
Agree 0 3 9 13 7 9 10 3 0 1
Neutral 0 1 7 8 2 8 3 0 1 0
Disagree 0 0 8 8 2 7 1 0 1 1
Strongly Disagree 0 1 8 9 1 1 2 0 0 0
No Answer 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 1 3

 

 

c) There is a case for building bungalows – especially for the elderly     

Response All
Strongly Agree 33
Agree 53
Neutral 37
Disagree 24
Strongly Disagree 14
No Answer 5

 

 

 Breakdown by Village

Response Halvergate Tunstall No Answer
Strongly Agree 27 5 1
Agree 48 3 2
Neutral 28 6 3
Disagree 20 2 2
Strongly Disagree 14 0 0
No Answer 4 0 1

 

 

Breakdown by 'Age of Household'

Response 20-24 25-29 30-44 45-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85-89 90+ NoAnswer
Strongly Agree 0 0 5 5 5 7 6 4 1 0
Agree 0 3 7 14 8 10 9 1 1 0
Neutral 0 1 11 10 0 10 4 0 1 0
Disagree 0 0 8 7 0 3 3 1 0 2
Strongly Disagree 0 1 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0
No Answer 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3

 

 

d) Smaller homes, affordable to younger families, should be encouraged      

Response All
Strongly Agree 20
Agree 54
Neutral 47
Disagree 25
Strongly Disagree 12
No Answer 8

 

 

Breakdown by village

Response Halvergate Tunstall No Answer
Strongly Agree 15 3 2
Agree 48 5 1
Neutral 41 3 3
Disagree 19 4 2
Strongly Disagree 12 0 0
No Answer 6 1 1

 

 

Breakdown by 'Age of Household'

Response 20-24 25-29 30-44 45-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85-89 90+ NoAnswer
Strongly Agree 0 0 4 4 2 5 4 1 0 0
Agree 0 3 12 9 8 12 6 2 1 1
Neutral 0 0 11 18 2 7 7 1 1 0
Disagree 0 1 4 8 0 5 4 0 0 3
Strongly Disagree 0 1 4 5 1 1 0 0 0 0
No Answer 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 1

 

 

e) We need a comprehensive plan covering building development in the area

Response All
Strongly Agree 43
Agree 69
Neutral 33
Disagree 9
Strongly Disagree 4
No Answer 8

 

 

Breakdown by village

Response Halvergate Tunstall No Answer
Strongly Agree 34 8 1
Agree 59 5 5
Neutral 30 2 1
Disagree 7 1 1
Strongly Disagree 4 0 0
No Answer 7 0 1

 

 

Breakdown by 'Age of Household'

Response 20-24 25-29 30-44 45-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85-89 90+ NoAnswer
Strongly Agree 0 0 10 12 8 6 6 1 0 0
Agree 0 2 14 22 5 13 8 2 1 2
Neutral 0 3 7 6 2 7 5 1 1 1
Disagree 0 0 3 2 0 3 1 0 0 0
Strongly Disagree 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0
No Answer 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 2